← Back to work
chain-rag, Cited Retrieval over Blockchain Protocol Docs
A second, independent vertical on the same architecture: cited answers over Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Monero, Polygon, and Cardano protocol docs, plus a router-calibration finding the reliability gates exist to catch.
- 22 docs / ~1,055 chunks
- corpus across 6 chains measured
- 8/8
- eval checks (6 per-chain + 1 cross-chain + 1 abstain) measured
- 3 PASS / 0 FAIL
- reliability gates (VecStamp, ChunkLedger, and more) measured one gate N/A for this corpus
A second domain
chain-rag rebuilds the Consilium approach on a different domain (blockchain protocol documentation) to check whether the architecture holds up outside the RFC corpus. It does, and the process surfaced a calibration issue.
What’s different
- A second, independent vertical: cited retrieval across six chains’ protocol docs (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Monero, Polygon, Cardano).
- The same reliability gates ran against the new corpus. One flagged a router-calibration finding: dense-embedder anchor thresholds need per-corpus tuning.
What it showed
Eight of eight eval checks pass: six per-chain, one cross-chain, one abstention, on a 22-document corpus. The blockchain angle is secondary: the architecture held up on a new corpus, and the gates caught a calibration bug instead of passing again.